Scout Ahead https://www.scoutahead.org/plans/venturing-boards-of-review

The Venturing board of review, start to finish

A common lead-in, a fork between the Discovery and Pathfinder particulars and the Summit particulars, and a rejoin at the review itself and everything after it.

40 steps (19 parts inside them). 40 steps and parts depend on questions you have not answered yet. · Version 1, published 8 August 2026 · About Venturing Boards of Review

This is the whole plan: everything that could apply to anybody. Answering the 3 questions at the address above takes out the parts that are not for you.

Which of this applies to you

You have not answered anything yet, so this is the whole plan: everything that could apply to anybody. Answering 3 short questions will take out the parts that are not for you.

Your progress

25 steps can be started now; 33 are waiting on something else.

Clear ticks

Your ticks are kept in this browser, so they will still be here next time. They are in the address as well, so a link to this page carries them to another device.

The steps

Stage 1 of 24

5 steps

Stage 2 of 24

1 step

Stage 3 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.2. A board of review is scheduled Task

    After the Advisor conference, the review is arranged. Venturers must not be denied the opportunity to appear before a board once the requirements are done.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.2. The Venturer participates in an Advisor conference.

Stage 4 of 24

1 step

Stage 5 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.0. Which rank is this board of review for? Decision

    The shared procedures are behind you; the particulars ahead differ. Discovery and Pathfinder are handled by the crew. Summit is handled by the council or district, and its gate is a verified application.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.2. The chair sets the date, time and place with all involved parties.

Stage 6 of 24

2 steps
  • 8.0.6.0. Particulars for the Discovery and Pathfinder ranks May not apply Milestone

    These apply only to Discovery and Pathfinder. This is the branch where a Scouts BSA leader is most likely to run the wrong meeting, because almost nothing about the room is the same.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.0. Which rank is this board of review for?.

    1 part
    • 8.0.7.0. A Discovery or Pathfinder decision cannot be appealed May not apply Often forgotten There is no appeal from a Discovery or Pathfinder decision, which makes getting the review right the first time the only protection the candidate has. It also means a board that was composed wrongly cannot be put right afterwards by somebody else.
  • 8.0.7.0. Particulars for the Summit rank May not apply Milestone

    The highest rank a Venturer may achieve, and the board reflects it: five or six members, a chair from the council or district, and a verified application before anybody sits down.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.0. Which rank is this board of review for?.

Stage 7 of 24

4 steps
  • 8.0.6.0. The board is the candidate's peers, chaired by the crew president May not apply Often forgotten Requirement

    Discovery and Pathfinder boards of review consist of the candidate's peers in the crew, and the crew president chairs. The chair selects the other board members from the crew.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.6.0. Particulars for the Discovery and Pathfinder ranks.

    Read this twice if you are used to Scouts BSA. The board is the candidate's peers, Venturers from the crew, and the crew president chairs it. Adults are present, but the board is not made of them.

    2 parts
  • 8.0.7.0. The local council must verify the Summit Rank Application first May not apply Often forgotten Approval

    A board of review must not occur until after the local council has verified the Summit Rank Application. This is a gate, not a formality, and scheduling around it is how a board gets held that should not have been.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. Particulars for the Summit rank.

    A hard gate and an easy one to trip. The board must not occur until the local council has verified the Summit Rank Application. Booking the room, the chair and five people before the council has finished is how a board ends up held that should not have been.

  • 8.0.7.1. A board under disputed circumstances is available for Summit Optional May not apply Event

    Available when a crew Advisor or committee chair will not sign the application, when a crew Advisor conference is denied, when it is thought a crew will not give a fair hearing, or when the Advisor or project beneficiary refuses to sign final approval for what might be a satisfactory project. Volunteers from the candidate's crew are not involved.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. Particulars for the Summit rank.

  • 8.0.7.2. Beyond the 21st birthday, read the Eagle Scout topic with 21 for 18 May not apply Requirement

    For a Summit board of review after a Venturer's 21st birthday, the Guide does not write out a separate procedure. It points at the Eagle Scout topic and says the procedures are the same, with references to the 18th birthday replaced by the 21st.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. Particulars for the Summit rank.

    1 part

Stage 8 of 24

2 steps

Stage 9 of 24

2 steps
  • 8.0.6.0. Parents, relatives and guardians should not attend in any capacity May not apply Requirement

    The Guide states this plainly for Discovery and Pathfinder boards, and "in any capacity" closes the door on attending as one of the two required adults.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.6.0. Two registered adults aged 21 or over must be present as advisors.

  • 8.0.7.0. The chair comes from the council or district advancement committee May not apply Often forgotten Requirement

    The chair must be an adult at least 21 years of age who is a Venturing-certified member of the local council or district advancement committee, or their designated Venturing-certified representative, selected according to local council practices.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. Five members minimum, six maximum.

    The chair does not come from the crew. It is a Venturing-certified member of the council or district advancement committee, or their designated representative, chosen by local council practice. A crew cannot appoint one of its own and proceed.

    1 part

Stage 10 of 24

2 steps

Stage 11 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.7.0. One more registered adult besides the chair, who works regularly with Venturing May not apply Requirement

    The board must include at least one adult in addition to the chair who is registered with Scouting America: preferably in the candidate's crew, and who works regularly with the Venturing program at any level.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. At least two Venturers, one of them from the candidate's crew.

    1 part
    • 8.0.7.0. The Advisor and the family must NOT be on the board May not apply Often forgotten Excluded outright: the crew Advisor, the associate Advisors, and the candidate's parents, guardians and relatives. And the candidate and family must have no part in choosing who does sit. Both halves of that get bent with good intentions.

Stage 12 of 24

1 step

Stage 13 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.7.0. Members convene at least 30 minutes early to read the application and workbook May not apply Task

    The board should meet at least half an hour before the scheduled review to go through the Summit application and the service project workbook, so the review itself is not spent reading.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.7.0. The crew president and the chair must agree the final membership.

Stage 14 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.7.0. 45 minutes or somewhat longer May not apply Requirement

    Summit boards generally last 45 minutes or somewhat longer. It is acceptable for the review to run on if the discussions are positive and enjoyable. This is the highest rank a Venturer may achieve.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

Stage 15 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.3. The board of review is held Event

    Where both branches meet. The purpose is to review the quality of the candidate's experience and, through discussion, to decide whether the Venturer has fulfilled the requirements. Venturers must not be denied this opportunity.

    Usually comes after 8.0.6.0. About 30 minutes, 8.0.7.0. 45 minutes or somewhat longer and 8.0.7.1. A board under disputed circumstances is available for Summit.

    1 part

Stage 16 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.3. It must NOT be a retest or an examination Often forgotten Requirement

    A Venturing board of review must not become a retest or an "examination", nor a challenge of a Venturer's knowledge. That is stated as a prohibition, not as a preference.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.3. The board of review is held.

    Stated as a prohibition. A Venturing board of review must not become a retest, an examination, or a challenge of the candidate's knowledge. If somebody on the board starts checking whether the Venturer can still do a thing they did last year, the review has gone wrong.

Stage 17 of 24

1 step

Stage 18 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.4. The Venturer waits out of hearing while the board deliberates Event

    After the review the candidate waits outside the room, or out of hearing, while the board decides. Every effort should be made to deliberate carefully and in enough detail to avoid factual misunderstanding.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.3. Discussions and stories about the fun, adventure and benefits.

Stage 19 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.4. A unanimous vote is required, and the chair votes Often forgotten Approval

    Approval of Venturing advancement requires a unanimous vote. The chair is a voting member. If any member dissents, the decision cannot be for approval.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.4. The Venturer waits out of hearing while the board deliberates.

    Unanimous, with the chair voting. One dissent means the decision cannot be for approval, and the candidate must never learn that there was a dissent, let alone whose. Before voting on a disagreement, check it is not a misunderstanding; calling the candidate back in is explicitly appropriate.

    1 part

Stage 20 of 24

1 step
  • 8.0.5.5. Did the board approve? Decision

    The fork that decides what happens in the next five minutes and the next five months. Both routes have things that must be done and things that must not be said.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.4. A unanimous vote is required, and the chair votes.

Stage 21 of 24

2 steps
  • 8.0.5.5. The candidate is called in and congratulated May not apply Milestone

    Where the board votes to approve, the Venturer is brought back in and congratulated. That is the whole of the ceremony the Guide describes at this point.

    You have not answered "Has the board been held, and how did it go?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. Did the board approve?.

  • 8.0.5.5. The candidate is told what to do to pass the board May not apply Task

    Where the board decides the requirements have not been fulfilled, the candidate must be told so, and told what to do about it. Being turned down without being told what would have worked is not one of the options.

    You have not answered "Has the board been held, and how did it go?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. Did the board approve?.

    1 part, all ticked
    • 8.0.5.5. Never any specifics of the deliberations May not apply Often forgotten Tell them what to improve. Tell them nothing about the conversation. "Two of us weren't sure about the service hours" is exactly the sentence the Guide forbids, and it is the one that comes out naturally when somebody is trying to be kind.

Stage 22 of 24

3 steps
  • 8.0.5.5. The board of review date is the rank's effective date May not apply Often forgotten Requirement

    Not the date the paperwork is filed, and not the date of the court of honor. The date the board sat is the date the rank takes effect.

    You have not answered "Has the board been held, and how did it go?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. The candidate is called in and congratulated.

    The rank is effective the day the board sat, not the day the paperwork was processed or the court of honor was held. Getting this wrong shifts tenure and can affect what the Venturer is eligible for next.

  • 8.0.5.5. A follow-up letter must be sent promptly May not apply Often forgotten Document

    In all cases where advancement is denied, a follow-up letter must be sent promptly to the Venturer who was turned down, suggesting actions that could help them complete the requirements successfully.

    You have not answered "Has the board been held, and how did it go?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. The candidate is told what to do to pass the board.

    Not optional and not satisfied by the conversation in the room. In all cases where advancement is denied a follow-up letter must be sent promptly, suggesting what would help the candidate succeed. For Summit it must also explain the appeal procedures.

    1 part
  • 8.0.7.0. A Summit candidate gets only ONE board of review May not apply Often forgotten Requirement

    The Summit candidate may have only one board of review, though it may be adjourned and reconvened. Subsequent action falls under the appeal process. There is no second board to arrange.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. The candidate is told what to do to pass the board.

    There is no second Summit board of review. It may be adjourned and reconvened, but once a board has concluded against the candidate, everything after that is the appeal process. A crew waiting to arrange another review is waiting for something that is not coming.

Stage 23 of 24

2 steps
  • 8.0.6.0. The chair reports the result May not apply Task

    For Discovery and Pathfinder the Guide names who hears it: the chair conducts the review according to Scouting America procedures and reports results to the crew Advisor and the advancement coordinator.

    You have not answered "Has the board been held, and how did it go?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. The board of review date is the rank's effective date.

  • 8.0.7.0. A Summit denial may be appealed Optional May not apply Task

    Negative decisions of a Summit board of review may be appealed. The Guide does not write out a separate procedure: it says to follow the Scouts BSA appeal topics and replace the Scouts BSA references with the Venturing ones.

    You have not answered "Which rank is this board of review for?" yet.

    Usually comes after 8.0.5.5. A follow-up letter must be sent promptly and 8.0.7.0. A Summit candidate gets only ONE board of review.

Stage 24 of 24

2 steps

This plan is a planning aid: the current Boy Scouts of America publication is always the authority, and the sources used here are listed in full. Each step names its own.